Call for Papers"Rural entrepreneurship in times of transformation"ENTREPRENEURSHIP AND REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT
The focus of scholarship on entrepreneurship and regional development has long been dominated by studies about how industries and new ventures enable the economic development of regions (Armington and Acs, 2002, Lee et al., 2004). Economic growth has been considered the desired outcome, and industrial clusters (Klofsten et al., 2016), triple helix collaboration (Etzkowitz and Zhou, 2017) and entrepreneurial ecosystems (Stam, 2015, Acs et al., 2017) have been considered the primary geographical phenomena of interest. Consequently, the level of analysis has often been national and/or county-based, with urban centres as the presupposed engines of growth (Iacobucci and Perugini, 2021, McKelvey and Zaring, 2016).
Yet, long term change patterns related to an increasing awareness of climate change and increasing regional inequalities within and across countries have accelerated rural and urban transformations with a global pandemic, populist movements, social unrest and devastating regional floods, droughts and forest fires (see e.g. Rodríguez-Pose, 2018). As these changes have taken centre stage, the classic paradigm of cities as drivers of economic growth is challenged. Regional development now means more than economic growth, as sustainability transitions, social value creation, resilience or even degrowth become desired policy aims as well as relevant outcome variables in empirical research in economic and human geography, organisation and even entrepreneurship research (Hudson, 2010, Kallis et al., 2018).
With this displacement of focus in regional development, rural entrepreneurship is of renewed interest (Hunt et al., 2021). While rural entrepreneurship takes many forms, our primary interest is not solely in entrepreneurial activities that happen to take place in sparsely populated places. Rather we would seek to emphasise rural entrepreneurship as activities that in various ways engage with rural spaces, communities, resources, values, histories and imageries, thus conceptualising rural entrepreneurship as a multifaceted socio-material activity (Korsgaard et al., 2015). While it was always the case that the rural is where food, energy, and water originates, the importance of the connectedness of the urban and rural stands out when resource flows need to become circular and environmentally sustainable. What happens in urban centres is dependent on the rural in complex and changing ways (Sarmiento, 2017) and vice versa. For the great transition (Rockström, 2015) to be possible, a broad range of entrepreneurial changes are needed. It is our contention that many 'good seeds' needed in the anthropocene (Bennett et al., 2016) comes from rural areas and from entrepreneurs who have a business situated in a sparsely populated area and who are embedded in the social and material reality of the rural (Korsgaard et al., 2015), including networks within and beyond familial circles (Anderson et al, 2005). The use of exaptation (Gaddefors et al., 2020) and bricolage among rural entrepreneurs are examples of sustainable strategies, as are the production of values beyond financial ones (Bosworth, 2012).
There is still much to learn from farmers and other rural entrepreneurs who are already using a circular logic (Rosenlund, 2021), for example, in terms of regenerative agriculture (Vlasov, 2021) and the development of alternative, prefigurative farm-to-fork circuits (Pascucci et al., 2021). In doing so, farmers and rural entrepreneurs create and reframe value by imbricating agentic matter (e.g., thriving plants, perishing food, or eroding lands cf. (Contesse et al., 2021, Cherrier, 2017) with their own agency (Muñoz and Branzei, 2021). In doing so, there is a need for a deeper understanding of diverse rural contexts (Muñoz and Kimmitt, 2019, Gaddefors and Anderson, 2017), which call for additional studies.
Hence, recent macro trends - involving existential threats such as climate change (Ranjan, 2015), pandemics (Korsgaard et al., 2020), biodiversity loss (Jia and Desa, 2020) and new technological opportunities such as digitalization (Bowen and Morris, 2019) – are shaping the value and the values of rural areas in novel ways. For example, urban families in the northern hemisphere migrate to the rural, craving for space, time, and direct access to food and cleaner air (Deller et al., 2019, Kalantaridis, 2010, Tillmar et al., 2022). The organizational thinness that has been a rural liability (Clausen, 2020) is now also valued for attracting both inhabitants (labour force and customers) and business opportunities. But the nature of rural entrepreneurship and the paradigm of regional development also seem to be changing in an even more fundamental manner. An institutional change is ongoing in the rural, where traditional rural values are amplified and challenged by movements towards more sustainable patterns of production and living. As such popular sustainability movements are rife with rural imagery of slowing down and connecting with nature, while they simultaneously fundamentally challenge the systems of agricultural production that are also engrained in traditional rural ways of living. Previous studies have shown that rural areas struggle with xenophobia (Tidholm, 2017) and traditional gender contracts (Forsberg, 1998, Bock and Shortall, 2006). For example, women entrepreneurs contribute social and community values, but receive very low incomes (Tillmar et al., 2022, Muñoz and Branzei, 2021). As scholars we should not fall into the trap of romanticizing the rural, nor should we be overly critical of rural life when it manifests as resistance to change (Gaddefors and Anderson, 2019). The question of rural values is thus a complicated one involving constant renegotiation and change as rural values are e.g. commodified (Anderson, 2000) the subject of intra-community tensions (Cucchi et al., 2021), and migrantion (Tillmar and Lindkvist, 2007, Fredin et al., 2019, Deller et al., 2019).
Submission to the Special Issue
By exploring these and related themes, we anticipate that this special issue will be relevant to entrepreneurship academics, as well as to those in business and the social sciences. This special issue contributes to ERD's mission of publishing interesting, courageous papers, which contribute to theories for understanding the extraordinary phenomenon of entrepreneurship.
This Call for Papers includes the option of participating in a paper development workshop (PDP). Participation in the PDP (scheduled before the Call for Papers deadline) is strongly encouraged for consideration in the Special Issue.
We invite contributions that reimagine and reflect on the current trends and the changing paradigm of entrepreneurship and rural development. Interdisciplinary approaches are welcome (cf. Hunt et al, 2021), as are empirical studies from various contexts.
Papers for the conference and PDW workshop for SI: 1 May 2023
Confirmation of acceptance to the PDW workshop: 7th of May 2023
PDW SI Workshop in Kalmar, Sweden: 12-16 June 2023
First submission for the SI: 31 January 2024
Review comments received: 1 July 2024
Second submission: 1 October 2024
Review and decision: 1 December 2024
Publication: April 2025
Special Issue Editors
Malin Tillmar, Linneuniversitetet firstname.lastname@example.org
Domenico Dentoni, Montpellier Business School email@example.com
Johan Gaddefors, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences Johan.Gaddefors@slu.se
Steffen Korsgaard, University of Southern Denmarkstko@sam.sdu.dk
William B. Gartner, Babson College, Linneuniversitetet firstname.lastname@example.org
Anderson, A. R., Jack, S. L., & Drakopoulou Dodd, S. (2005). The Role of Family Members In Entrepreneurial Networks: Beyond the Boundaries of the Family Firm. Family Business Review, 18(2), 135–154. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-6248.2005.00037
ACS, Z. J., STAM, E., AUDRETSCH, D. B. & O'CONNOR, A. 2017. The lineages of the entrepreneurial ecosystem approach. Small Business Economics, 49, 1-10.
ANDERSON, A. 2000. Paradox in the periphery: an entrepreneurial reconstruction? Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 12, 91-109.
ARMINGTON, C. & ACS, Z. J. 2002. The determinants of regional variation in new firm formation. Regional studies, 36, 33-45.
BENNETT, E. M., SOLAN, M., BIGGS, R., MCPHEARSON, T., NORSTRÖM, A. V., OLSSON, P., PEREIRA, L., PETERSON, G. D., RAUDSEPP‐HEARNE, C. & BIERMANN, F. 2016. Bright spots: seeds of a good Anthropocene. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 14, 441-448.
BOCK, B. B. & SHORTALL, S. (eds.) 2006. Rural gender relations: issues and case studies, Wallingord, UK: CABI.
BOSWORTH, G. 2012. Characterising rural businesses–Tales from the paperman. Journal of Rural Studies, 28, 499-506.
BOWEN, R. & MORRIS, W. 2019. The digital divide: Implications for agribusiness and entrepreneurship. Lessons from Wales. Journal of Rural Studies, 72, 75-84.
CHERRIER, H. 2017. Food capacity in alternative food markets: visceral encounters, bodily interactions and contagious magic. Journal of Marketing Management, 33, 602-623.
CLAUSEN, T. H. 2020. The liability of rurality and new venture viability. Journal of Rural Studies, 73, 114-121.
CONTESSE, M., DUNCAN, J., LEGUN, K. & KLERKX, L. 2021. Unravelling non-human agency in sustainability transitions. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 166, 120634.
CUCCHI, C., LUBBERINK, R., DENTONI, D. & GARTNER, W. B. 2021. 'That's Witchcraft': Community entrepreneuring as a process of navigating intra-community tensions through spiritual practices. Organization Studies, 01708406211031730.
DELLER, S., KURES, M. & CONROY, T. 2019. Rural entrepreneurship and migration. Journal of Rural Studies, 66, 30-42.
ETZKOWITZ, H. & ZHOU, C. 2017. The triple helix: University–industry–government innovation and entrepreneurship, Routledge.
FORSBERG, G. 1998. Regional variations in the gender contract: Gendered relations in labour markets, local politics and everyday life in Swedish regions Innovation. The European Journal of Social Science Research, 11, 191-209.
FREDIN, S., MIÖRNER, J. & JOGMARK, M. 2019. Developing and sustaining new regional industrial paths: investigating the role of 'outsiders' and factors shaping long-term trajectories. Industry and Innovation, 26, 795-819.
GADDEFORS, J. & ANDERSON, A. 2017. Entrepreneursheep and context: when entrepreneurship is greater than entrepreneurs. International journal of entrepreneurial behaviorresearch, 23, 267-278.
GADDEFORS, J. & ANDERSON, A. R. 2019. Romancing the rural: Reconceptualizing rural entrepreneurship as engagement with context(s). The International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation, 20, 159-169.
GADDEFORS, J., KORSGAARD, S. & INGSTRUP, M. B. 2020. Regional development through entrepreneurial exaptation: Epistemological displacement, affordances, and collective agency in rural regions. Journal of Rural Studies, 74, 244-256.
HUDSON, R. 2010. Resilient regions in an uncertain world: wishful thinking or a practical reality? Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 3, 11-25.
HUNT, R. A., TOWNSEND, D. M., KORSGAARD, S. & NAAR, A. 2021. Urban Farmers and Cowboy Coders: Reimagining Rural Venturing in the 21st Century. Academy of Management Perspectives, 35, 660-681.
IACOBUCCI, D. & PERUGINI, F. 2021. Entrepreneurial ecosystems and economic resilience at local level. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 1-28.
JIA, X. & DESA, G. 2020. Social entrepreneurship and impact investment in rural–urban transformation: An orientation to systemic social innovation and symposium findings. Agriculture and Human Values, 37, 1217-1239.
KALANTARIDIS, C. 2010. In-migration, entrepreneurship and rural–urban interdependencies: The case of East Cleveland, North East England. Journal of Rural Studies, 26, 418-427.
KALLIS, G., KOSTAKIS, V., LANGE, S., MURACA, B., PAULSON, S. & SCHMELZER, M. 2018. Research On Degrowth. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 43, 291-316.
KLOFSTEN, M., MALMSTRÖM, L. & JONES-EVANS, D. 2016. Att träna företagare som står inför en tillväxtfas eller viktig förändring: ett svenskt praktikfall.
KORSGAARD, S., HUNT, R. A., TOWNSEND, D. M. & INGSTRUP, M. B. 2020. COVID-19 and the importance of space in entrepreneurship research and policy. International Small Business Journal, 38, 697-710.
KORSGAARD, S., MÜLLER, S. & TANVIG, H. 2015. Rural entrepreneurship or entrepreneurship in the rural–between place and space. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 21, 5-26.
LEE, S. Y., FLORIDA, R. & ACS, Z. 2004. Creativity and entrepreneurship: A regional analysis of new firm formation. Regional studies, 38, 879-891.
MCKELVEY, M. & ZARING, O. 2016. Sveriges entreprenöriella ekosystem. Stockholm: Esbri.
MUÑOZ, P. & BRANZEI, O. 2021. Regenerative Organizations: Introduction to the Special Issue. Organization & Environment, 34, 507-516.
MUÑOZ, P. & KIMMITT, J. 2019. Rural entrepreneurship in place: An integrated framework. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 31, 842-873.
PASCUCCI, S., DENTONI, D., CLEMENTS, J., POLDNER, K. & GARTNER, W. B. 2021. Forging forms of authority through the sociomateriality of food in partial organizations. Organization Studies, 42, 301-326.
RANJAN, R. 2015. Rural entrepreneurism and developmental outcomes under climate change threats. Climate and Development, 7, 353-366.
ROCKSTRÖM, J. 2015. Bounding the planetary future: Why we need a great transition. Great Transition Initiative, 9, 1-13.
RODRÍGUEZ-POSE, A. 2018. The revenge of the places that don't matter (and what to do about it). Cambridge journal of regions, economy and society, 11, 189-209.
ROSENLUND, J. 2021. The Environmental Concerns of Food Ecopreneurs. Sustainability, 13, 6211.
SARMIENTO, E. R. 2017. Synergies in alternative food network research: embodiment, diverse economies, and more-than-human food geographies. Agriculture and Human Values, 34, 485-497.
STAM, E. 2015. Entrepreneurial Ecosystems and Regional Policy: A Sympathetic Critique. European Planning Studies, 23, 1759-1769.
TIDHOLM, P. 2017. Läget i landet, Teglund Publishing.
TILLMAR, M. & LINDKVIST, L. 2007. Cooperation against all odds: Finding reasons for trust where formal institutions fail. International Sociology, 22, 343-366.
TILLMAR, M., SKÖLD, B., AHL, H., BERGLUND, K. & PETTERSSON, K. 2022. Women's rural businesses: for economic viability or gender equality?–a database study from the Swedish context. International Journal of Gender and Entrepreneurship.
VLASOV, M. 2021. In Transition Toward the Ecocentric Entrepreneurship Nexus: How Nature Helps Entrepreneurs Make Ventures More Regenerative Over Time. Organization & Environment, 34, 559-580.
Connect to the Division