I apologize for cross-posting to my fellow ENT DIG Colleagues.
π Join Us at the 84th Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management! π
Ready to decode the secrets of publishing?
Join us at AOM's PDW #350: Deciphering the Relationships of Co-Creation: Author, Reviewer, and Editor Roles in Peer Reviews (10096) for a deep dive into conversations about demystifying the roles of authors, reviewers, and editors! πβ¨ Letβs unlock the mysteries together at AOM 2024! ππ
π
Date: Saturday, August 10, 2024
π Time: 12:00 pm - 1:00 pm CT
π Location: Fairmont - State Room
π Add to Your Favorites - See you in Chicago!
View the program session here: AOM 2024
| Eventscribe |
remove preview |
|
|
Academy of Management, hashtag#HealthcareManagement DIG. A session featuring candid conversations with top expert panelists: Timothy Huerta, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Andrew Hanna, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Geoff Silvera, UAB Department of Health Services Administration, Scott L. Newbert, Baruch College and moderator: Charleata Battle, DBA, MBA, California State University, Los Angeles.
AOM Platinum Sponsor @Georgia State University - J. Mack Robinson College of Business Institute of Health Administration!
Early academic careerists are expected to swiftly build national scholarly reputations through the co-creation of academic literature published in top ranked peer-reviewed journals (McGrail et al., 2006). Although many new scholars have demonstrated mastery in numerous subject matters, some have limited academic acumen and understanding of the peer-review publication process. (Miller and Van de Ven, 2015) noted the peer review process involves inviting expert scholars in the field to assist in evaluating the quality and appropriateness of journal submissions.
Decades of engaged scholarly debate have still insufficiently deciphered peculiar editor, reviewer, and author perspectives within the peer review processes their roles in the co-creation of new academic literature. Scholarly research is a life-long process whereby senior scholars play an invaluable role in modeling the tone of the peer review process for junior scholars (McMullen and Newbert, 2023). The challenge within publishing is to get published in places that are likely to be noticed (Kritchevsky, 2018).
Academic institutions have historically indoctrinated the concept of βpublic or perishβ as the dominant credo in academia (Niles, et al., 2020) without providing early career scholars with interventions aimed to increase academic publication rates among new scholars. (McGrail et al., 2006) found only a small percentage of academics actively participated in the publishing process although some higher education institutions have launched creative interventions like writing coaches, writing courses, and engaged scholarship support groups to increase publication outputs.
------------------------------
Charleata Battle, DBA, MBA
Assistant Professor Management, Healthcare Management
MS Healthcare Management Graduate Student Services Coordinator
California State University, Los Angeles
Los Angeles, California
------------------------------