James - if you want to be one of us, quit making sense and being nice! LOL
Seriously, you do see the issues. So post more, ok?
You're right: What if impact is in another domain? It could be a
game-changer there - assessing that is tough. I remember [old age
alert] flying to AoM and reading the Economist & seeing them reference
Busenitz & Barney, How cool was that? Lowell was happy but I was
stunned at how underwhelmed most were. Seeing a top education journal
cite Ron Mitchell's great script cue work was cool too, but again most
ENT folks were unexcited.
Maybe the answer is to celebrate whenever what we do helps? Not sure
how to rigorously assess it but maybe Chihmao's tool could help?
And what if it's (gasp) not an academic impact? I worked with a PhD
student whose first pub was... The Congressional Record (USA). My
Congressman still remembers it, But zero points for tenure, LOL.
OK, maybe time to get back to Bill S's original query? Jerry Katz, as
always, had a great idea but maybe some of the really cool stuff need
not be in management journals. My mentor, Al Shapero, made his bones
in Psychology Today -I met the editor years later & he hugged me, just
for knowing Al. Now we see Johan Wiklund write a killer piece in PT..
more people will have read that piece than probably all our journals
combined. (It helps that it's good, of course, though as a
neurodiverse-ish guy I'm likely biased? :)
There is much to discuss (ok, argue about) here - maybe this could be
a theme for one of those AoM Specialized Conferences? We can't be the
only domain that wrestles with this. And I suspect adding a global
dimension would "spice" it up even more?
On 1/9/18, EIX Service <
info@eiexchange.com> wrote:
> Greetings!
>
>
> Non-scholar, practitioner, ENTREP-L lurker here -- enjoying the spirited
> discussion about the impact of publications and, more broadly, the
> proliferation and acceptance of good ideas within the ENT community. This
> topic is super interesting to me.
>
>
> As an outsider who will not become an ENT scholar, my concern really lies in
> defining "impact" as how many people (1) know about and also (2) derived
> benefit from something, and how significantly? ENT is so important to our
> world, because it provides a runway for innovation, jobs, careers,
> livelihoods, communities, families, security...
>
>
> A problem with pure citation counts as a measure of impact or influence, to
> me, is that people who think alike think alike... So, a well-articulated
> piece can gain mass acceptance for reasons other than pure "impact", by
> virtue of its being accepted by people who understand and can think (or want
> to think) like the author. IE, even with outstanding ideas, very little
> intellectual "distance" may be traversed in gaining support and quantities
> of citations. Like William Wallace rousing the troops...
>
>
> Perhaps this is common knowledge for you all (or totally off base), and
> please forgive my naivete, but to me "influence" is the ability to not just
> line up the slam dunk audiences or existing believers, but additionally to
> traverse some "distance" and reach people who would otherwise not know or
> care about the topic. I'm thinking about a sociology or communications
> scholar who gets cited by entrepreneurship researchers, or an ENT scholar
> whose work reaches mainstream literature. The ability to attract and
> influence people "farther away" from the subject, to me, speaks of quality
> and impact. It tells me that an idea is activating and compelling people to
> get better or learn something extra, based on the gravity or promise of the
> concept to improve lives. In my work, putting ideas to beneficial
> application is my only real focus.
>
>
> So, in my mind, a bibliocentric analysis of citations that is somehow
> segmented, to understand the distance or reach of citations (counts) among
> layers of lesser-related audiences is interesting to me. E.g., citation
> counts bucketed by: ENT scholars, ENT PhD theses, Business Scholars, and
> outward to fields of Economics, Sociology, Technology, etc.... I do
> understand that each "leap" of distance may entail a translation or dilution
> of the concepts, and less weightiness in the impact calculation, but perhaps
> not inherently so. Particularly lucid or simple concepts may survive the
> telephone game and thus illustrate particularly efficacious impact.
>
>
> I'm humbly appreciative of the time you've invested in this message! Perhaps
> I'm in the wrong ballpark. I will take your collective silence as a signal
> to go back to my regular job and leave scholaring to the experts!
>
>
> --
>
> Regards,
>
> James Beal
> Managing Editor
> EIX.org | e-Fest 2018
> Entrepreneur & Innovation Exchange
>
>
jb@eix.org
> @eixsocial
>
>
> Sent from BlueMail
>
> On Jan 9, 2018, 6:59 AM, at 6:59 AM, "Honig, Benson" <
bhonig@MCMASTER.CA>
> wrote:
>>Norris (and et al) it’s always easier to identify the ‘greats’ ex post-
>>doing so ex ante is the real problem. I’ve done some work on the issue
>>of scholarly assessment (a couple of AMLE articles, and a forthcoming
>>AMP that address these issues) and can say it is a field –wide problem
>>that is not going away. Citations are an easy measure that has serious
>>problems (see Mike Lounsbury’s , Joel Baum, Jim Walsh, and David
>>Sirmon’s sections here):
>>
>>http://amp.aom.org/content/early/2017/09/29/amp.2015.0167.full.pdf+html
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>To Erik’s point (and in all transparency, I’ve participated) citations
>>provide a clean and somewhat objective criteria to compare
>>contributions. Having said that, the time is past for us to recognize
>>other scholarly inputs in tenure evaluations (including Norris’s
>>eternal and usually optimistic contributions!). Norris, your point
>>about Bandura reminds me of an Israeli movie called “footnote”. I think
>>you can find it on Netflix. It covers a lot of the ground you refer to.
>>Let’s discuss it in Chicago.
>>
>>
>>
>>However, at the end of the day, we have to rely on a panel of so called
>>‘experts’ to identify the best contributions. Erik has done a
>>formidable job in facilitating that process. Norris and others would
>>certainly be invited or can volunteer in that activity. Yet, as with
>>contemporary art or literature that rarely stands the test of time, we
>>get waylaid by the ‘fads and fashions’ (Abrahamson, 1996) of the field
>>(Norris: ent self-efficacy might be just another fad – along with
>>Venture Capital, Matrix Management, Business Plans, EO, and who knows
>>what else…). So, while I was coincidentally fortunate enough to co-win
>>a Grief award, I remain highly skeptical of the significance of
>>citations – it is yet one important indicator of influence to consider
>>when identifying major contributions. Citing is not reading, reading is
>>not citing.
>>
>>
>>
>>Of course, nothing that I am aware of could come near measuring the
>>profound influence of one highly supportive and perennially positive
>>Norris Krueger to the field of entrepreneurship. For that, we need the
>>Norris Krueger award for best supporter, broadcaster, and overall
>>collegial character – and yes- I agree to nominate Norris for the first
>>award!
>>
>>
>>
>>Benson Honig Ph.D.
>>
>>Teresa Cascioli Chair in Entrepreneurial Leadership
>>
>>McMaster University DeGroote School of Business Hamilton Ontario
>>
>>Tel 905-525-9140ex 23943
>>
>>Cell 905-518-1716
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>From: Entrepreneurship Division Listserv <
ENTREP@AOMLISTS.AOM.ORG> on
>>behalf of Norris Krueger <
norris.krueger@gmail.com>
>>Reply-To: Norris Krueger <
norris.krueger@gmail.com>
>>Date: Tuesday, January 9, 2018 at 1:33 AM
>>To: "ENTREP@AOMLISTS.AOM.ORG" <
ENTREP@AOMLISTS.AOM.ORG>
>>Subject: Re: [ENTREP] Must Reads from the Past Decade for PhD Seminar
>>
>>
>>
>>Sorry to seem cranky - the Greif & AoM ENT awards are wonderful
>>recognition! But does the raw number of citations really matter in
>>terms of being truly influential? It might be an indirect marker, I
>>agree, but it doesn't tell us if it's stood the test of time. So why
>>not look at those top 10 most-cited lists? Wouldn't that seem more
>>inclusive? (p.s. I did offer 3 suggestions, 2 at the end of my post.)
>>
>>
>>
>>The history of science is littered with examples that the real
>>difference-makers that newcomers must read are rarely obvious at the
>>time, maybe for decades later. (Einstein's critics got referenced a lot
>>more than his relativity articles. Would he have made any of our lists
>>in 1915?) Of course, at least in the sciences, I suspect the
>>prescription would be to not identify articled but people. And people
>>who were influential back in the day might be uninteresting today.
>>
>>
>>
>>I think that Bill is asking for us to figure out what ARE the
>>parameters of truly influential. For most people, there are 2-3
>>articles/chapters/books that were difference-makers and that's likely a
>>most idiosyncratic process. Even if we focus on what changed the
>>direction of the field or some subset thereof, that may not be obvious
>>in citations or these lists. Hence the suggestion of a bibliometric
>>approach -use co-citation analysis, etc .to assess who was influential,
>>not just cited.
>>
>>
>>
>>Bibliometrics can also help us see WHO cites that article. For a simple
>>example, you write a paper on entrep self-efficacy and get only 3
>>citations... but they're all by Bandura himself. How many random cites
>>is that worth?
>>
>>
>>
>>I have no idea what those would look like for venture capital or SME
>>marketing or any of a long list. I think I can speak to cognitive &
>>social psychology, etc. and to ecosystems & some policy issues... maybe
>>the answer is to divide the labor... what if we could find 1
>>difference-maker in each topic? It could trigger some fascinating
>>discussion about the complex set of trajectories that our field has...
>>
>>
>>
>>OK, #4... boring but a Delphi approach would be easy?
>>
>>
>>
>>[p.s. in the spirit of full disclosure, I'll never win a Greif or
>>Division award so that might be a bias for me... but I think this is a
>>more important question than just a reading list and it makes me want
>>to see if we can identify the real game-changers... and how to assess
>>that. If anyone wants to take a whack at this, I'm happy to help - or
>>butt out - as you wish!]
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>Norris
>>
>>"How can I help you to grow entrepreneurs?"
>>
>>Norris Krueger, Ph.D.
>>
>>Entrepreneurship Northwest
>> 208.440.3747
>>
>>Blog:
http://bit.ly/NKblog2a
>>Presentations:
http://bit.ly/NKpres
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>On Mon, Jan 8, 2018 at 4:40 PM, Monsen, Erik <
emonsen@bsad.uvm.edu>
>>wrote:
>>
>>Hello Norris,
>>
>>First, no matter how you define "truly influential", the fact that a
>>Greif Research Impact Award winning article has acheived the greatest
>>number of citations in a six year window, is a clear and objective sign
>>that researchers are reading and using the article, which is something
>>worth celebrating and recommending as reading to our PhD students.
>>
>>Second, I am sorry to hear that you think that the Entrepreneurship
>>Division's Foundational Paper award list is political. Given that I
>>have personally managed this process for the past two years, I can tell
>>you from first hand experience that this process has been as democratic
>>and as mathematical as a former aerospace engineer (which I am) can
>>manage.
>>
>>To begin, any member of the Entrepreneurship Division can nominate a
>>paper that has been published over ten years ago. Next, all of members
>>of the entrepreneurship division's Research Committee - now 40 in total
>>- have a chance to provide their numerical rankings of the most
>>influential nominated articles. And based on this quantitative data, I
>>statistically compute which article is most influential in the eyes of
>>the committee.
>>
>>Now, while you are free to contend that these quantitative processes
>>might not identify the articles which you define as "truly
>>influential", these are very mechanical and quantiative processes with
>>no room for personal or professional politics.
>>
>>That said, if you can recommend a quantiative and democratic process
>>that is better at identifying your "truly influential" articles, please
>>let me know and I would be happy to try it out.
>>
>>Best Regards,
>>
>>Erik
>>
>>
>>________________________________
>>From: Norris Krueger <
norris.krueger@gmail.com>
>>Sent: Monday, January 8, 2018 5:49 PM
>>To: Monsen, Erik
>>Cc:
ENTREP@AOMLISTS.AOM.ORG
>>Subject: Re: [ENTREP] Must Reads from the Past Decade for PhD Seminar
>>
>>But, Erik... is most-cited (Greif) really a marker of what's been truly
>>influential? Some of those clearly haven't passed the test of time.
>>The ENT Div's list is pretty political - as in who deserves it versus
>>the game-changers that Bill asked for? Name recognition is huge in our
>>Division's list
>>Hans Landstrom had his list... none excite me at all.
>>Any of this lists will reflect the preferences of those compiling and
>>probably location (there will be a NorAm/Europe bias... I just read a
>>killer physics paper from Hungary & a school I'd never heard - but it's
>>going to be a huge game-changer.
>>
>>What about DeNoble's self-efficacy scale -- he never even got that
>>paper published!
>>
>>I suggested to Bill to think about a more bibliometric approach - how
>>did citations on a topic change before & after that article?
>>
>>A thought: You can also go to G-Scholar and look up the top 5-10
>>most-cited articles for JBV, ETP, ERD, etc. (I did that for the
>>Division a couple years ago & thought those were fascinating lists, not
>>just the usual suspects... and SEJ & SBE and you've spanned the domain
>>pretty well.
>>
>>Another thought: A tournament. Identify 32 (or ?) contenders - then
>>pair them off and have people pick one, then repeat as desired. Make it
>>easy & fun. Still have a name recognition issue but we could adjust via
>>seeding?
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>Norris
>>
>>"How can I help you to grow entrepreneurs?"
>>Norris Krueger, Ph.D.
>>Entrepreneurship Northwest
>> 208.440.3747
>>Blog:
http://bit.ly/NKblog2a
>>Presentations:
http://bit.ly/NKpres
>>
>>
>>
>>On Wed, Jan 3, 2018 at 7:07 PM, Monsen, Erik
>><
emonsen@bsad.uvm.edu<mailto:
emonsen@bsad.uvm.edu>> wrote:
>>Greetings!
>>
>>No need to reinvent the wheel! May I suggest the articles which have
>>won USC's Greif Research Impact Award and the winners of the ENT
>>Division's Foundational Paper Award:
>>
>>http://division.aomonline.org/ent/index.php/awards/recent-award-winners
>>
>>Best Regards,
>>
>>Erik Monsen
>>
>>ENT Division Research Committee Chair
>>
>>
>>________________________________
>>From: Entrepreneurship Division Listserv
>><
ENTREP@AOMLISTS.AOM.ORG<mailto:
ENTREP@AOMLISTS.AOM.ORG>> on behalf of
>>Norris Krueger
>><
norris.krueger@GMAIL.COM<mailto:
norris.krueger@GMAIL.COM>>
>>Sent: Wednesday, January 3, 2018 8:06 PM
>>To:
ENTREP@AOMLISTS.AOM.ORG<mailto:
ENTREP@AOMLISTS.AOM.ORG>
>>Subject: Re: [ENTREP] Must Reads from the Past Decade for PhD Seminar
>>
>>Might we suggest no self-serving nominations? :)
>>
>>
>>Norris
>>
>>"How can I help you to grow entrepreneurs?"
>>Norris Krueger, Ph.D.
>>Entrepreneurship Northwest
>> 208.440.3747<tel:208.440.3747>
>>Blog:
http://bit.ly/NKblog2a
>>Presentations:
http://bit.ly/NKpres
>>
>>
>>
>>On Wed, Jan 3, 2018 at 5:56 PM, Jeff Pollack
>><
jmpolla3@ncsu.edu<mailto:
jmpolla3@ncsu.edu><mailto:
jmpolla3@ncsu.edu<mailto:
jmpolla3@ncsu.edu>>>
>>wrote:
>>Thanks Bill & Julio for getting this topic started—my sense is that
>>there will be great interest here.
>>
>>I created this google spreadsheet (Click
>>Here<https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1tItc4X1tU2-F8GjSDuwSWGO-Maqnwng24ZQHKf5HOEA/edit#gid=0>)
>>so that folks might put in their recommended articles. If you all like
>>this method, great—it is publicly available and anyone can see/edit it.
>>If not, then feel free to email Bill and Julio and they can aggregate
>>suggestions.
>>
>>Best, Jeff
>>
>>
>>Jeff Pollack
>>Associate Professor
>>Management, Innovation, and Entrepreneurship Department
>>Poole College of Management
>>NC State University
>>2801 Founders
>>Drive<https://maps.google.com/?q=2801+Founders+Drive&entry=gmail&source=g>,
>>Campus Box 7229
>>Raleigh, NC 27695-7229
>>804.397.0818<tel:804.397.0818><tel:(804)%20397-0818> phone
>>
jmpolla3@ncsu.edu<mailto:
jmpolla3@ncsu.edu><mailto:
jmpolla3@ncsu.edu<mailto:
jmpolla3@ncsu.edu>>
>>
>>
>>On Jan 3, 2018, at 5:56 PM, Julio de Castro
>><
Julio.Castro@IE.EDU<mailto:
Julio.Castro@IE.EDU><mailto:
Julio.Castro@IE.EDU<mailto:
Julio.Castro@IE.EDU>>>
>>wrote:
>>
>>I would also like to see such a list, as I will be teaching a
>>principles of ent course. Not to step on Bill's idea but to streamline
>>the process maybe a suggestion would be for people to provide a top
>>five or top 10 list. That way we would not get a lot of single
>>articles but articulated lists
>>
>>Get Outlook for Android<https://aka.ms/ghei36>
>>
>>________________________________
>>From: Entrepreneurship Division Listserv
>><
ENTREP@AOMLISTS.AOM.ORG<mailto:
ENTREP@AOMLISTS.AOM.ORG><mailto:
ENTREP@AOMLISTS.AOM.ORG<mailto:
ENTREP@AOMLISTS.AOM.ORG>>>
>>on behalf of Bill Schulze
>><
bill.schulze@ECCLES.UTAH.EDU<mailto:
bill.schulze@ECCLES.UTAH.EDU><mailto:
bill.schulze@ECCLES.UTAH.EDU<mailto:
bill.schulze@ECCLES.UTAH.EDU>>>
>>Sent: Wednesday, January 3, 2018 3:49:54 PM
>>To:
>>
ENTREP@AOMLISTS.AOM.ORG<mailto:
ENTREP@AOMLISTS.AOM.ORG><mailto:
ENTREP@AOMLISTS.AOM.ORG<mailto:
ENTREP@AOMLISTS.AOM.ORG>>
>>Subject: [ENTREP] Must Reads from the Past Decade for PhD Seminar
>>
>>At risk of sparking a long list, I thought it would be interesting to
>>ask for suggestions about articles published over the past decade that
>>are MUST READS for doctoral students.
>>
>>I look forward to your suggestions, and will compile and share the
>>result when done.
>>
>>Thanks in advance!
>>
>>************************************** This message is from ENTREP
>>which is sponsored by the Entrepreneurship Division of the Academy of
>>Management. Please do not post messages with attached files. Commercial
>>messages or spammed messages are not allowed on the list. The use of
>>auto-responder "out-of-office" messages may also lead to your removal
>>from the list. You can manage your subscription options, including
>>joining or leaving the list here:
>>http://aomlists.pace.edu/scripts/wa.exe?SUBED1=entrep&A=1 If you have
>>questions or need help, please contact Jeff Pollack
>>(
jeff_pollack@ncsu.edu<mailto:
jeff_pollack@ncsu.edu><mailto:
jeff_pollack@ncsu.edu<mailto:
jeff_pollack@ncsu.edu>>)
>>or Kevin Cox
>>(
kcox24@my.fau.edu<mailto:
kcox24@my.fau.edu><mailto:
kcox24@my.fau.edu<mailto:
kcox24@my.fau.edu>>).
>>Ventures HO!
>>************************************** This message is from ENTREP
>>which is sponsored by the Entrepreneurship Division of the Academy of
>>Management. Please do not post messages with attached files. Commercial
>>messages or spammed messages are not allowed on the list. The use of
>>auto-responder "out-of-office" messages may also lead to your removal
>>from the list. You can manage your subscription options, including
>>joining or leaving the list
>>here:http://aomlists.pace.edu/scripts/wa.exe?SUBED1=entrep&A=1 If you
>>have questions or need help, please contact Jeff Pollack
>>(
jeff_pollack@ncsu.edu<mailto:
jeff_pollack@ncsu.edu><mailto:
jeff_pollack@ncsu.edu<mailto:
jeff_pollack@ncsu.edu>>)
>>or Kevin Cox
>>(
kcox24@my.fau.edu<mailto:
kcox24@my.fau.edu><mailto:
kcox24@my.fau.edu<mailto:
kcox24@my.fau.edu>>).
>>Ventures HO!
>>
>>************************************** This message is from ENTREP
>>which is sponsored by the Entrepreneurship Division of the Academy of
>>Management. Please do not post messages with attached files. Commercial
>>messages or spammed messages are not allowed on the list. The use of
>>auto-responder "out-of-office" messages may also lead to your removal
>>from the list. You can manage your subscription options, including
>>joining or leaving the list here:
>>http://aomlists.pace.edu/scripts/wa.exe?SUBED1=entrep&A=1 If you have
>>questions or need help, please contact Jeff Pollack
>>(
jeff_pollack@ncsu.edu<mailto:
jeff_pollack@ncsu.edu><mailto:
jeff_pollack@ncsu.edu<mailto:
jeff_pollack@ncsu.edu>>)
>>or Kevin Cox
>>(
kcox24@my.fau.edu<mailto:
kcox24@my.fau.edu><mailto:
kcox24@my.fau.edu<mailto:
kcox24@my.fau.edu>>).
>>Ventures HO!
>>
>>************************************** This message is from ENTREP
>>which is sponsored by the Entrepreneurship Division of the Academy of
>>Management. Please do not post messages with attached files. Commercial
>>messages or spammed messages are not allowed on the list. The use of
>>auto-responder "out-of-office" messages may also lead to your removal
>>from the list. You can manage your subscription options, including
>>joining or leaving the list here:
>>http://aomlists.pace.edu/scripts/wa.exe?SUBED1=entrep&A=1 If you have
>>questions or need help, please contact Jeff Pollack
>>(
jeff_pollack@ncsu.edu<mailto:
jeff_pollack@ncsu.edu>) or Kevin Cox
>>(
kcox24@my.fau.edu<mailto:
kcox24@my.fau.edu>). Ventures HO!
>>
>>**************************************
>>This message is from ENTREP which is sponsored by the Entrepreneurship
>>Division of the Academy of Management.
>>
>>To post messages to the ENTREP Listserv, please email your message to
>>
ENTREP@AOMLISTS.AOM.ORG<mailto:
ENTREP@AOMLISTS.AOM.ORG>.
>>
>>
>>Please do not post messages with attached files. Commercial messages or
>>spammed messages are not allowed on the list. The use of
>>auto-responder "out-of-office" messages may also lead to your removal
>>from the list.
>>
>>You can manage your subscription options, including joining or leaving
>>the list here:
>>http://aomlists.pace.edu/scripts/wa.exe?SUBED1=entrep&A=1
>>
>>If you have questions or need help, please contact Jeff Pollack
>>(
jeff_pollack@ncsu.edu<mailto:
jeff_pollack@ncsu.edu>) or Kevin Cox
>>(
kcox24@my.fau.edu<mailto:
kcox24@my.fau.edu>).
>>
>>Ventures HO!
>>
>>
>>
>>************************************** This message is from ENTREP
>>which is sponsored by the Entrepreneurship Division of the Academy of
>>Management. Please do not post messages with attached files. Commercial
>>messages or spammed messages are not allowed on the list. The use of
>>auto-responder "out-of-office" messages may also lead to your removal
>>from the list. You can manage your subscription options, including
>>joining or leaving the list here:
>>http://aomlists.pace.edu/scripts/wa.exe?SUBED1=entrep&A=1 If you have
>>questions or need help, please contact Jeff Pollack
>>(
jeff_pollack@ncsu.edu) or Kevin Cox (
kcox24@my.fau.edu). Ventures HO!
>>
>>************************************** This message is from ENTREP
>>which is sponsored by the Entrepreneurship Division of the Academy of
>>Management. Please do not post messages with attached files. Commercial
>>messages or spammed messages are not allowed on the list. The use of
>>auto-responder "out-of-office" messages may also lead to your removal
>>from the list. You can manage your subscription options, including
>>joining or leaving the list here:
>>http://aomlists.pace.edu/scripts/wa.exe?SUBED1=entrep&A=1 If you have
>>questions or need help, please contact Jeff Pollack
>>(
jeff_pollack@ncsu.edu) or Kevin Cox (
kcox24@my.fau.edu). Ventures HO!
>
> **************************************
> This message is from ENTREP which is sponsored by the Entrepreneurship
> Division of the Academy of Management.
>
> To post messages to the ENTREP Listserv, please email your message to
>
ENTREP@AOMLISTS.AOM.ORG.
>
> Please do not post messages with attached files. Commercial messages or
> spammed messages are not allowed on the list. The use of auto-responder
> "out-of-office" messages may also lead to your removal from the list.
>
> You can manage your subscription options, including joining or leaving the
> list here:
>
http://aomlists.pace.edu/scripts/wa.exe?SUBED1=entrep&A=1
>
> If you have questions or need help, please contact Jeff Pollack
> (
jeff_pollack@ncsu.edu) or Kevin Cox (
kcox24@my.fau.edu).
>
> Ventures HO!
>
--
Norris
*"How can I help you to grow entrepreneurs?" *
Norris Krueger, Ph.D.
Entrepreneurship Northwest
208.440.3747
Blog:
http://bit.ly/NKblog2a
Presentations:
http://bit.ly/NKpres
**************************************
This message is from ENTREP which is sponsored by the Entrepreneurship Division of the Academy of Management.
To post messages to the ENTREP Listserv, please email your message to
ENTREP@AOMLISTS.AOM.ORG.
Please do not post messages with attached files. Commercial messages or spammed messages are not allowed on the list. The use of auto-responder "out-of-office" messages may also lead to your removal from the list.
You can manage your subscription options, including joining or leaving the list here:
http://aomlists.pace.edu/scripts/wa.exe?SUBED1=entrep&A=1
If you have questions or need help, please contact Jeff Pollack (
jeff_pollack@ncsu.edu) or Kevin Cox (
kcox24@my.fau.edu).
Ventures HO!