All,
Let me add my two cents to this discussion, which may not be worth even
that much. First, Jerry Katz asked me to write an article on the "Evolution
of Business Plans in National & International Business Plan Competitions",
which will appear in the Advances in Entrepreneurship: Firm Emergence and
Growth 2017 annual text that he edits with Andrew Corbett. In this article,
I describe the changes that have occurred in the business plans submitted
to such competitions and the major reasons for these changes. One of the
key points of the article is that the required maximum lengths for such
plans have decreased from 40 pages to 18 pages primarily because of pressure
from VCs who are the major judges used in such competitions. Another of
the key points is that plans that are based primarily on "academic" research
NEVER get to these competitions anymore. Put differently, one MUST go out
and talk to real potential customers, real suppliers, etc in order to develop
plans that will qualify for such competitions, which was the basis for Gary
Cadenhead's book "No Longer Moot." There were a number of other important
points and conclusions of my paper, but out of respect for Andrew & Jerry,
I cannot cover them here.
My second point is that I am also the founder and organizer of one of these
competitions, specifically, the Georgia Bowl, which is the first U.S. based
competition in each competition season. One of the key aspects of the Georgia
Bowl is its "Evaluation Criteria." Most Venture Labs Feeder competitions used
the Venture Labs Evaluation Criteria, which placed about 75% of a team's score
on the "Quality & Effectiveness of its Plan & Presentation. By contrast, the
Georgia Bowl placed 80% of the "Evaluation" on the Startup Feasibility, Long-
term Potential, Launch Team Capabilities, and Investor Reward-Risk Attractiveness"
of the proposed venture and only 20% on the "Quality & Effectiveness of the
team's Plan & Presentation". One further point here. For 2017, the Georgia Bowl
will replace the 18 Page Business Plans that it has used historically with a
10 page Executive Summary with 6-to-7 pages of text and 3-to-4 pages of Exhibits
- mostly pro-forma Financial Exhibits. [Note; Rice is the other competition that
does not use the Venture Labs Evaluation criteria. Rice typically has 20-to-25
Judges in most of it brackets almost all of whom are VCs. It has these VCs rate
the six ventures in each bracket from 1 (for First) to 6 (for last) asking these
VC judges to vote in accordance with where they would place their money. Rice
then just totals these scores and advances the two teams with the lowest scores
in each bracket to the next round.]
Sincerely,
Dr. Chuck Hofer
Georgia Bowl Founder & Organizer
770-455-4280 Cell 1
770-757-3575 Cell 2
----- Original Message -----
From: "MeeksPhD" <
MeeksPhD@GMAIL.COM>
To: "ENTREP" <
ENTREP@AOMLISTS.PACE.EDU>
Sent: Wednesday, June 29, 2016 9:23:08 AM
Subject: [ENTREP] FW: [ENTREP] End of Business Plans in B Schools?
Hi Boyd:
I happen to be in precisely the same situation, and it all seems to stem from an extreme case of unconscious incompetence. In addition to the program issues you mention, I have local and national organizations asking for my support, and advice on how to improve their "business plan" competitions -- and their "business plan" formats are from MANY years past. In addition, my administrators (most have an MBA), deans, chairs, and colleagues (from within the biz school and across campus) carry a very strong and outdated perspective of "business plans," and are completely unfamiliar with canvases, design school, etc.. Again, these decision makers or power-holding influencers suffer from illusory superiority (Dunning-Kruger). They are entirely unaware that this is no longer our father's entrepreneurship. Would you please share any "offline" feedback you receive/collect.
Thanks,
-Michael Meeks
-----Original Message-----
From: Entrepreneurship Division Listserv [mailto:
ENTREP@AOMLISTS.PACE.EDU] On Behalf Of Boyd Cohen
Sent: Wednesday, June 29, 2016 5:31 AM
To:
ENTREP@AOMLISTS.PACE.EDU
Subject: [ENTREP] End of Business Plans in B Schools?
I suspect this topic has been covered here before although I haven’t seen it recently. I do recall some asking about how they do business plans in their programs but my question relates to the extent to which we have shifted away from business plans in entrepreneurship programs towards design thinking and lean startup.
I ask because I am at a private business school in Barcelona (EADA) where all our students are masters (MBA, EMBA, IMBA, etc) and every program uses a roughly standardized business plan project as the capstone to the Master’s. This is my first year at EADA and I have grown increasingly frustrated advising teams on business plans (I have 4 teams where I am their primary tutor) because I no longer believe in the value of business plans at the concept stage of a startup.
Has anyone done any research (does not have to be peer reviewed) on the shift away from business planning in entrepreneurship programs? Do any of you have any anecdotal or other supporting evidence I can use at EADA to help convince the administration that it is time to shift to design thinking and lean startup? My personal research interests are in areas related to sustainable entrepreneurship, sharing economy, etc. so I am only advising students in those areas but I still find it frustrating that we are doing everything in the hypothetical world instead of executing MVPs and learning from real users.
Thanks in advance for any of your thoughts.
Boyd
**************************************
This message is from ENTREP which is sponsored by the Entrepreneurship Division of the Academy of Management.
Please do not post messages with attached files. Commercial messages or spammed messages are not allowed on the list. The use of auto-responder "out-of-office" messages may also lead to your removal from the list.
You can manage your subscription options, including joining or leaving the list here:
http://aomlists.pace.edu/scripts/wa.exe?SUBED1=entrep&A=1
If you have questions or need help, please contact Jeff Pollack (
jeff_pollack@ncsu.edu) or Kevin Cox (
kcox24@my.fau.edu).
Ventures HO!
**************************************
This message is from ENTREP which is sponsored by the Entrepreneurship Division of the Academy of Management.
Please do not post messages with attached files. Commercial messages or spammed messages are not allowed on the list. The use of auto-responder "out-of-office" messages may also lead to your removal from the list.
You can manage your subscription options, including joining or leaving the list here:
http://aomlists.pace.edu/scripts/wa.exe?SUBED1=entrep&A=1
If you have questions or need help, please contact Jeff Pollack (
jeff_pollack@ncsu.edu) or Kevin Cox (
kcox24@my.fau.edu).
Ventures HO!
**************************************
This message is from ENTREP which is sponsored by the Entrepreneurship Division of the Academy of Management.
Please do not post messages with attached files. Commercial messages or spammed messages are not allowed on the list. The use of auto-responder "out-of-office" messages may also lead to your removal from the list.
You can manage your subscription options, including joining or leaving the list here:
http://aomlists.pace.edu/scripts/wa.exe?SUBED1=entrep&A=1
If you have questions or need help, please contact Jeff Pollack (
jeff_pollack@ncsu.edu) or Kevin Cox (
kcox24@my.fau.edu).
Ventures HO!