Amanda (and colleagues),
I took the word "risky" from the Chronicle story and mixed it with another concept (not named in my note): heterodox (as economists might say), or just plain unusual. But I think the main thing is risk. To me, this means trying work that has potentially high rewards but also potentially minimal or unpublishable results. I think this is correlated with innovation. On the upside, there are other possible "rewards" but one of these would be innovation in the sense of breaking new ground. On the downside, contrary to your reviewing approach, journals do not do well with work that is difficult to pidgeonhole and hence review. And I think this is getting worse, not better, with journals becoming harder to distinguish globally (in approach and style if not quality).
Thanks,
Alex
Alex Stewart, Ph.D.
Professor of Management
Coleman Foundation Chair in Entrepreneurship
Marquette University
Milwaukee, WI 53201-1881
Office: 414 288-7188
************************************** This message is from ENTREP which is sponsored by the Entrepreneurship Division of the Academy of Management. Please do not post messages with attached files. Commercial messages or spammed messages are not allowed on the list. The use of auto-responder "out-of-office" messages may also lead to your removal from the list. You can manage your subscription options, including joining or leaving the list here:
http://aomlists.pace.edu/scripts/wa.exe?SUBED1=entrep&A=1 If you have questions or need help, please contact Jeff Pollack (
jeff_pollack@ncsu.edu) or John Bunch (
jbunch@benedictine.edu). Ventures HO!