Discussion: View Thread

  • 1.  Judging Rubric for Elevator Pitches

    Posted 05-06-2014 14:26
    I was wondering if any one has a grading/judging rubric they like and would be willing to share for student elevator pitches? One tailored to social enterprises would be great is anyone has one, but that is not a necessity.

    Feel free to email me directly.

    Thank you very much for your assistance. 

    Raymond



    --
    Raymond J. Jones, III, Ph.D.
    Assistant Professor of Entrepreneurship
    Management Studies Department
    Labovitz School of Business and Economics
    University of Minnesota Duluth
    1318 Kirby Drive, LSBE 365B
    Duluth, MN 55812
    Office: 218-726-6093
    ************************************** This message is from ENTREP which is sponsored by the Entrepreneurship Division of the Academy of Management. Please do not post messages with attached files. Commercial messages or spammed messages are not allowed on the list. The use of auto-responder "out-of-office" messages may also lead to your removal from the list. You can manage your subscription options, including joining or leaving the list here: http://aomlists.pace.edu/scripts/wa.exe?SUBED1=entrep&A=1 If you have questions or need help, please contact Dr. John Bunch jbunch@benedictine.edu. Ventures HO!


  • 2.  Judging Rubric for Elevator Pitches

    Posted 05-07-2014 08:42
    If you get one, I'd like a copy too.

    Bob

    Robert N. Lussier, PhD
    Professor of Management
    Springfield College
    Springfield, MA 01109
    413-748-3202


    On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 2:25 PM, Raymond Jones wrote:

     I was wondering if any one has a grading/judging rubric they like and would be willing to share for student elevator pitches? One tailored to social enterprises would be great is anyone has one, but that is not a necessity.

    Feel free to email me directly.


    Thank you very much for your assistance. 


    Raymond





    --
    Raymond J. Jones, III, Ph.D. Assistant Professor of Entrepreneurship
    Management Studies Department
    Labovitz School of Business and Economics
    University of Minnesota Duluth
    1318 Kirby Drive, LSBE 365B
    Duluth, MN 55812
    Office: 218-726-6093
    ************************************** This message is from ENTREP which is sponsored by the Entrepreneurship Division of the Academy of Management. Please do not post messages with attached files. Commercial messages or spammed messages are not allowed on the list.  The use of auto-responder "out-of-office" messages may also lead to your removal from the list. You can manage your subscription options, including joining or leaving the list here: http://aomlists.pace.edu/scripts/wa.exe?SUBED1=entrep&  If you have questions or need help, please contact Dr. John Bunch  jbunch@benedictine.edu. Ventures HO!
    ************************************** This message is from ENTREP which is sponsored by the Entrepreneurship Division of the Academy of Management. Please do not post messages with attached files. Commercial messages or spammed messages are not allowed on the list. The use of auto-responder "out-of-office" messages may also lead to your removal from the list. You can manage your subscription options, including joining or leaving the list here: http://aomlists.pace.edu/scripts/wa.exe?SUBED1=entrep&A=1 If you have questions or need help, please contact Dr. John Bunch jbunch@benedictine.edu. Ventures HO!


  • 3.  Judging Rubric for Elevator Pitches

    Posted 05-07-2014 12:30
    We use this video which lays the foundation for a rubric.



    ==================
    SCORING YOUR PITCH
    ==================
    Pain Statement:     ___ /10
    Value Proposition:  ___/10

    Succinct:___ /5
    Greed Inducing: ___ /5
    Easy to Understand: ___ /5
    Irrefutable: ___ /5

    Total:   ___ /40






    On Wed, May 7, 2014 at 8:42 AM, R + M Lussier <r-m-lussier@charter.net> wrote:
    If you get one, I'd like a copy too.

    Bob

    Robert N. Lussier, PhD
    Professor of Management
    Springfield College
    Springfield, MA 01109


    On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 2:25 PM, Raymond Jones wrote:

     I was wondering if any one has a grading/judging rubric they like and would be willing to share for student elevator pitches? One tailored to social enterprises would be great is anyone has one, but that is not a necessity.

    Feel free to email me directly.


    Thank you very much for your assistance. 


    Raymond





    --
    Raymond J. Jones, III, Ph.D. Assistant Professor of Entrepreneurship
    Management Studies Department
    Labovitz School of Business and Economics
    University of Minnesota Duluth
    1318 Kirby Drive, LSBE 365B
    Duluth, MN 55812
    Office: 218-726-6093
    ************************************** This message is from ENTREP which is sponsored by the Entrepreneurship Division of the Academy of Management. Please do not post messages with attached files. Commercial messages or spammed messages are not allowed on the list.  The use of auto-responder "out-of-office" messages may also lead to your removal from the list. You can manage your subscription options, including joining or leaving the list here: http://aomlists.pace.edu/scripts/wa.exe?SUBED1=entrep&  If you have questions or need help, please contact Dr. John Bunch  jbunch@benedictine.edu. Ventures HO!
    ************************************** This message is from ENTREP which is sponsored by the Entrepreneurship Division of the Academy of Management. Please do not post messages with attached files. Commercial messages or spammed messages are not allowed on the list. The use of auto-responder "out-of-office" messages may also lead to your removal from the list. You can manage your subscription options, including joining or leaving the list here: http://aomlists.pace.edu/scripts/wa.exe?SUBED1=entrep&A=1 If you have questions or need help, please contact Dr. John Bunch jbunch@benedictine.edu. Ventures HO!



    --
    ==========================================================================
    Dr. Sean Wise  BA LLB MBA PhD
    Asst. Professor of Entrepreneurship & Strategy, Ted Rogers School of Business Management
    RYERSON UNIVERSITY 
    ===========================================================================
    Director, Dobson Micro-Financing Seed Venture Fund Chair, Ryerson Angel Network Chair, $50,000 Slaight Business Plan Competition Member, Digital Media Zone, Steering Committee
    ===========================================================================
    Mailing address: 350 Victoria St., Toronto, ON  M5B2K3 
    Office address: 55 Dundas St. W, TRS 2-076

    Ted Rogers School of Management at Ryerson University is Canada's pre-eminent entrepreneurial-focused business management school that is shaping the next generation of global innovators  and leaders with a combination of experiential and theoretical learning. Ted Rogers School of Management is AACSB accredited and home to six schools of management, two MBA degrees and 12 research centres and institutes.




    ************************************** This message is from ENTREP which is sponsored by the Entrepreneurship Division of the Academy of Management. Please do not post messages with attached files. Commercial messages or spammed messages are not allowed on the list. The use of auto-responder "out-of-office" messages may also lead to your removal from the list. You can manage your subscription options, including joining or leaving the list here: http://aomlists.pace.edu/scripts/wa.exe?SUBED1=entrep&A=1 If you have questions or need help, please contact Dr. John Bunch jbunch@benedictine.edu. Ventures HO!


  • 4.  Judging Rubric for Elevator Pitches

    Posted 05-07-2014 12:58
    I typically use a five-item rubric for judging pitches based on how well the pitcher conveys (1) a compelling unmet need or big pain, (2) a brilliant solution that logically follows the big pain, (3) how the pitcher's solution is different and better than what the target is currently using, (4) the "why me?" factor, and (5) a call to action. I also give my students this worksheet to help them construct their pitches <http://profcraigarmstrong.wikispaces.com/file/view/Write%20a%20Pitch%20In-Class%20Worksheet.pdf/406976788/Write%20a%20Pitch%20In-Class%20Worksheet.pdf>. I sometimes substitute the "why me?" item with a status report. 

    I derived these items from a 2003(!) AOM PDW by Bill Joos (then of Garage.com). Hope this helps!

    Craig E. Armstrong, Ph.D.
    Associate Professor of Entrepreneurship


    On Wed, May 7, 2014 at 7:42 AM, R + M Lussier <r-m-lussier@charter.net> wrote:
    If you get one, I'd like a copy too.

    Bob

    Robert N. Lussier, PhD
    Professor of Management
    Springfield College
    Springfield, MA 01109


    On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 2:25 PM, Raymond Jones wrote:

     I was wondering if any one has a grading/judging rubric they like and would be willing to share for student elevator pitches? One tailored to social enterprises would be great is anyone has one, but that is not a necessity.

    Feel free to email me directly.


    Thank you very much for your assistance. 


    Raymond





    --
    Raymond J. Jones, III, Ph.D. Assistant Professor of Entrepreneurship
    Management Studies Department
    Labovitz School of Business and Economics
    University of Minnesota Duluth
    1318 Kirby Drive, LSBE 365B
    Duluth, MN 55812
    Office: 218-726-6093
    ************************************** This message is from ENTREP which is sponsored by the Entrepreneurship Division of the Academy of Management. Please do not post messages with attached files. Commercial messages or spammed messages are not allowed on the list.  The use of auto-responder "out-of-office" messages may also lead to your removal from the list. You can manage your subscription options, including joining or leaving the list here: http://aomlists.pace.edu/scripts/wa.exe?SUBED1=entrep&  If you have questions or need help, please contact Dr. John Bunch  jbunch@benedictine.edu. Ventures HO!
    ************************************** This message is from ENTREP which is sponsored by the Entrepreneurship Division of the Academy of Management. Please do not post messages with attached files. Commercial messages or spammed messages are not allowed on the list. The use of auto-responder "out-of-office" messages may also lead to your removal from the list. You can manage your subscription options, including joining or leaving the list here: http://aomlists.pace.edu/scripts/wa.exe?SUBED1=entrep&A=1 If you have questions or need help, please contact Dr. John Bunch jbunch@benedictine.edu. Ventures HO!

    ************************************** This message is from ENTREP which is sponsored by the Entrepreneurship Division of the Academy of Management. Please do not post messages with attached files. Commercial messages or spammed messages are not allowed on the list. The use of auto-responder "out-of-office" messages may also lead to your removal from the list. You can manage your subscription options, including joining or leaving the list here: http://aomlists.pace.edu/scripts/wa.exe?SUBED1=entrep&A=1 If you have questions or need help, please contact Dr. John Bunch jbunch@benedictine.edu. Ventures HO!


  • 5.  Judging Rubric for Elevator Pitches

    Posted 05-07-2014 16:55
    All,

    The E-Division's List-serve will not allow me to send you the various
    attachments I have mentioned below. Send me an E-mail directly to
    get them. I have listed the C-2-R Detailed evaluation below after my
    signature so you will have some idea of what each involves.

    There are a number of different ways to make such assessments. The
    University of Texas's engineering school developed an Idea-2-Product
    Competition in the 1990's to make sure that their engineering students
    created realistic projects. It then created an external Idea-2-Product
    Competition in 2003 that invited teams from other U.S. colleges and
    universities. Still later, it invited various international schools
    to I-2-P. Finally, I-2-P itself went international with the first two
    international competitions held in Stockholm, Sweden, in 2011 and 2012.
    Finally, last year's 2013 competition was held in Sao Paulo, Brazil.
    I have attached the judging form that is used in these competitions.

    Also attached is a set of Elevator Pitch guidelines proposed by Rice
    University that is associated with its international business plan
    competition.

    At Kennesaw. we have also created a "Concept-2-Reality" competition
    to encourage students, faculty, alumnae, community members and others
    to turn their concepts into real businesses. I have attached the two
    Evaluation Forms that we use for this competition.  The first form
    lists the factors that we evaluate for all proposed concepts, and the
    second form then summarizes these evaluations for all of the concepts
    that have entered the C-2-R competition.  In the early rounds, when
    there are over 20 concepts, we just double or triple the table to
    cover 40 to 60 concepts. Typically, we have about 20 entries by the
    finals when we use the version attached. I have also attached a set
    of descriptions of the 85 Finalists that we have had in the first 14
    competitions that we have held.

    Finally, I would note that the University of Texas has a website that
    describes its Idea-2-Product Competition, and lists the Finalists for
    all of the competitions since its founding in 2003. It also lists most
    of the participants for these competitions, but I am not sure it has
    covered them all.

    Sincerely,
    Dr. Chuck Hofer
    Regents Professor
    Kennesaw State University
    678-797-2502 KSU Office
    770-757-3575 Cell

    CONCEPT-2-REALITY EVALUATION FORM
    Copyright 8 1997 by Charles W. Hofer
    Venture ____________________________

    Reviewer_____________________________

    I. STARTUP FEASIBILITY RATING [Maximum Score 100]

    I. PRODUCT/SERVICE FEASIBILITY Score (Pick One)
    1.Product/Service Idea Conceived 10
    2.Product/Service Design Finalized 20
    3.Product/Service Prototype Completed 30
    4.Product/Service Final Product Available 40
    5.Product/Service In Use & Reliability Checked 50

    II. MARKET/CUSTOMER FEASIBILITY Score (Pick One)
    1.Market/Customer Demand Assumed 10
    2.Survey of Customers Market Completed 20
    3.Some Customers Have Made Purchases 30
    4.Substantial #s of Customers Have Made Purchases 40
    5.Substantial # of Customers Have Made Repurchases 50

    LONG TERM PROFIT POTENTIAL RATING [Maximum Score 100]

    I. SIZE OF (POTENTIAL) CUSTOMER BASE Score (Pick one)
    1.Limited Appeal Market (Niche Market) 5
    2.Moderate Appeal Market (Small Segment) 10
    3.Intermediate Appeal Market (Medium Segment) 15
    4.Mass Appeal Market (Large & Very Large Segments) 20

    II. ANNUAL SALES REVENUES PER CUSTOMER Score (Pick one)
    1.$1 to $100/year 5
    2.$100 to $1000/year 10
    3.$1000 to $10,000/year 15
    4.> $10,000/year 20

    III.NUMBER & STRENGTH OF COMPETITORS Score (Pick one)
    1.Mostly Weak Competitors 20
    2.Several Competent Competitors 15
    3.Many Competent Competitors
    or a Few Strong Competitors 10
    4.Several Strong Competitors 5

    IV.YOUR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGES Score (Pick one)
    1.Several Minor Advantages, or
    a Few Moderate Advantages 5
    2.Many Moderate Advantages, or
    a Few Strong Advantages 10
    Many Strong Advantages 20

    V.SUSTAINABILITY OF ADVANTAGES Score (Pick one)
    1.Advantages Primarily Short-Term in Duration 5
    2.Advantages of Intermediate Duration 10
    3.Advantages of Long Duration 20

    TOTAL RATING SCORE [Maximum Score 200] _____


    ----- Original Message -----
    From: "Raymond Jones" <rjjones@D.UMN.EDU>
    To: ENTREP@AOMLISTS.PACE.EDU
    Sent: Tuesday, May 6, 2014 2:25:51 PM
    Subject: [ENTREP] Judging Rubric for Elevator Pitches

    I was wondering if any one has a grading/judging rubric they like and would
    be willing to share for student elevator pitches? One tailored to social
    enterprises would be great is anyone has one, but that is not a necessity.

    Feel free to email me directly.

    Thank you very much for your assistance.

    Raymond



    --
    Raymond J. Jones, III, Ph.D.
    Assistant Professor of Entrepreneurship
    Management Studies Department
    Labovitz School of Business and Economics
    University of Minnesota Duluth
    1318 Kirby Drive, LSBE 365B
    Duluth, MN 55812
    Office: 218-726-6093

    **************************************
    This message is from ENTREP which is sponsored by the Entrepreneurship Division of the Academy of Management.

    Please do not post messages with attached files. Commercial messages or spammed messages are not allowed on the list.  The use of auto-responder "out-of-office" messages may also lead to your removal from the list.

    You can manage your subscription options, including joining or leaving the list here:
    http://aomlists.pace.edu/scripts/wa.exe?SUBED1=entrep&A=1

    If you have questions or need help, please contact Dr. John Bunch  jbunch@benedictine.edu.

    Ventures HO!

    **************************************
    This message is from ENTREP which is sponsored by the Entrepreneurship Division of the Academy of Management.

    Please do not post messages with attached files. Commercial messages or spammed messages are not allowed on the list. The use of auto-responder "out-of-office" messages may also lead to your removal from the list.

    You can manage your subscription options, including joining or leaving the list here:
    http://aomlists.pace.edu/scripts/wa.exe?SUBED1=entrep&A=1

    If you have questions or need help, please contact Dr. John Bunch jbunch@benedictine.edu.

    Ventures HO!


  • 6.  Judging Rubric for Elevator Pitches

    Posted 05-07-2014 17:42
    All,

    Here's what I sent directly to the original poster, but thought others might also like to review.  

    Included at the following link are a few resources that you might find useful: http://www.edgeofentrepreneurship.com/p/pitch.html   

    I use the "3 for 3" when individual students pitch three new product or service concepts in three minutes.  The second form "1 for 15" is for a team-based end-of-semester 15-minute pitch on a product or service.  The final form is what we use for team presentations within the College of Business here at Cal State San Marcos.  

    Please feel free to use them, adapt them, throw them away, or refine them.  I'd welcome your comments or thoughts.  

    Best wishes,
    Ben

    -- 

    Bennett Cherry, Ph.D.

    Department Chair, Management

    Associate Professor of Entrepreneurship     http://www.csusm.edu/coba  

    California State University San Marcos          

    Editor - The Edge of Entrepreneurship       http://www.edgeofentrepreneurship.com


    On 5/7/14, 1:54 PM, "Charles Hofer" <chofer@KENNESAW.EDU> wrote:

    All,

    The E-Division's List-serve will not allow me to send you the various
    attachments I have mentioned below. Send me an E-mail directly to
    get them. I have listed the C-2-R Detailed evaluation below after my
    signature so you will have some idea of what each involves.

    There are a number of different ways to make such assessments. The
    University of Texas's engineering school developed an Idea-2-Product
    Competition in the 1990's to make sure that their engineering students
    created realistic projects. It then created an external Idea-2-Product
    Competition in 2003 that invited teams from other U.S. colleges and
    universities. Still later, it invited various international schools
    to I-2-P. Finally, I-2-P itself went international with the first two
    international competitions held in Stockholm, Sweden, in 2011 and 2012.
    Finally, last year's 2013 competition was held in Sao Paulo, Brazil.
    I have attached the judging form that is used in these competitions.

    Also attached is a set of Elevator Pitch guidelines proposed by Rice
    University that is associated with its international business plan
    competition.

    At Kennesaw. we have also created a "Concept-2-Reality" competition
    to encourage students, faculty, alumnae, community members and others
    to turn their concepts into real businesses. I have attached the two
    Evaluation Forms that we use for this competition.  The first form
    lists the factors that we evaluate for all proposed concepts, and the
    second form then summarizes these evaluations for all of the concepts
    that have entered the C-2-R competition.  In the early rounds, when
    there are over 20 concepts, we just double or triple the table to
    cover 40 to 60 concepts.  Typically, we have about 20 entries by the
    finals when we use the version attached.  I have also attached a set
    of descriptions of the 85 Finalists that we have had in the first 14
    competitions that we have held.

    Finally, I would note that the University of Texas has a website that
    describes its Idea-2-Product Competition, and lists the Finalists for
    all of the competitions since its founding in 2003.  It also lists most
    of the participants for these competitions, but I am not sure it has
    covered them all.

    Sincerely,
    Dr. Chuck Hofer
    Regents Professor
    Kennesaw State University
    678-797-2502 KSU Office
    770-757-3575 Cell

    CONCEPT-2-REALITY  EVALUATION  FORM
    Copyright  8 1997 by Charles W. Hofer
    Venture  ____________________________

    Reviewer_____________________________

    I. STARTUP FEASIBILITY RATING  [Maximum Score 100]
    I. PRODUCT/SERVICE FEASIBILITY              Score (Pick One)      
    1.Product/Service Idea Conceived            10      
    2.Product/Service Design Finalized            20      
    3.Product/Service Prototype Completed            30      
    4.Product/Service Final Product Available          40      
    5.Product/Service In Use & Reliability Checked    50      

    II. MARKET/CUSTOMER FEASIBILITY              Score (Pick One)      
    1.Market/Customer Demand Assumed            10      
    2.Survey of Customers Market Completed            20      
    3.Some Customers Have Made Purchases            30      
    4.Substantial #s of Customers Have Made Purchases  40      
    5.Substantial # of Customers Have Made Repurchases 50      

    LONG TERM PROFIT POTENTIAL RATING [Maximum Score 100]

    I. SIZE OF (POTENTIAL) CUSTOMER BASE       Score (Pick one)      
    1.Limited Appeal Market (Niche Market)             5          
    2.Moderate Appeal Market (Small Segment)    10          
    3.Intermediate Appeal Market (Medium Segment)    15          
    4.Mass Appeal Market (Large & Very Large Segments) 20          

    II. ANNUAL SALES REVENUES PER CUSTOMER        Score (Pick one)      
    1.$1 to $100/year                             5          
    2.$100 to $1000/year                            10          
    3.$1000 to $10,000/year                            15          
    4.> $10,000/year                            20          

    III.NUMBER & STRENGTH OF COMPETITORS          Score (Pick one)      
    1.Mostly Weak Competitors                    20          
    2.Several Competent Competitors                    15          
    3.Many Competent Competitors
        or a Few Strong Competitors                    10          
    4.Several Strong Competitors                     5          
    IV.YOUR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGES          Score (Pick one)      
    1.Several Minor Advantages, or
         a Few Moderate Advantages                     5          
    2.Many Moderate Advantages, or
         a Few Strong Advantages                    10          
      Many Strong Advantages                    20          

    V.SUSTAINABILITY OF ADVANTAGES                 Score (Pick one)      
    1.Advantages Primarily Short-Term in Duration     5          
    2.Advantages of Intermediate Duration            10          
    3.Advantages of Long Duration                    20          

    TOTAL RATING SCORE [Maximum Score 200]           _____


    ----- Original Message -----
    From: "Raymond Jones" <rjjones@D.UMN.EDU>
    Sent: Tuesday, May 6, 2014 2:25:51 PM
    Subject: [ENTREP] Judging Rubric for Elevator Pitches

    I was wondering if any one has a grading/judging rubric they like and would
    be willing to share for student elevator pitches? One tailored to social
    enterprises would be great is anyone has one, but that is not a necessity.

    Feel free to email me directly.

    Thank you very much for your assistance.

    Raymond



    --
    Raymond J. Jones, III, Ph.D.
    Assistant Professor of Entrepreneurship
    Management Studies Department
    Labovitz School of Business and Economics
    University of Minnesota Duluth
    1318 Kirby Drive, LSBE 365B
    Duluth, MN 55812
    Office: 218-726-6093

    **************************************
    This message is from ENTREP which is sponsored by the Entrepreneurship Division of the Academy of Management.

    Please do not post messages with attached files. Commercial messages or spammed messages are not allowed on the list.  The use of auto-responder "out-of-office" messages may also lead to your removal from the list.

    You can manage your subscription options, including joining or leaving the list here:

    If you have questions or need help, please contact Dr. John Bunch  jbunch@benedictine.edu.

    Ventures HO!

    **************************************
    This message is from ENTREP which is sponsored by the Entrepreneurship Division of the Academy of Management.

    Please do not post messages with attached files. Commercial messages or spammed messages are not allowed on the list.  The use of auto-responder "out-of-office" messages may also lead to your removal from the list.

    You can manage your subscription options, including joining or leaving the list here:

    If you have questions or need help, please contact Dr. John Bunch  jbunch@benedictine.edu.

    Ventures HO!



    ************************************** This message is from ENTREP which is sponsored by the Entrepreneurship Division of the Academy of Management. Please do not post messages with attached files. Commercial messages or spammed messages are not allowed on the list. The use of auto-responder "out-of-office" messages may also lead to your removal from the list. You can manage your subscription options, including joining or leaving the list here: http://aomlists.pace.edu/scripts/wa.exe?SUBED1=entrep&A=1 If you have questions or need help, please contact Dr. John Bunch jbunch@benedictine.edu. Ventures HO!


  • 7.  Judging Rubric for Elevator Pitches

    Posted 05-08-2014 11:49
    here is a true story about an elevator pitch... it has nothing to do with the original question... about 5 minutes to read.  It's entitled:

    The Elevator Singer[1]


    Laurie and I went up to Baltimore today to see a touring Broadway play, "Ghost"... a musical adaptation of the well-known movie starring Patrick Swayze and Demi Moore.  The movie... and the play... are most notable because of the lead song, "Unchained Melody"  (Oh... my love... my darling... etc.)  Really a great song.


    After the play, we followed the crowd out to the parking garage, where we had parked before the performance.  We had to wait quite a bit... maybe 15 minutes... for the elevator, since we had parked on the 5th level, and the climb was a bit too much for my 75 yr old legs.  Finally, the elevator arrived almost in front of us, and we entered, along with about 15 other people.  We did put quite a few people on the elevator.


    The door closed, and people called out their various floors.  We got up to the third floor, and the elevator slowed... and then started to lurch and bump.  Lurch, bump, lurch... about 4 times.  Finally it stopped.  According to the indicator, we were at the 3rd level.  Someone said "I want to get out!" in a very insistent tone of voice, so someone pressed the door "open" button, and the door opened on the 3rd level.  About 3 people rushed out, looking very fearful.  Somebody said, "Anybody else?", and since I still did not want to climb 2 floors, Laurie and I elected to stay on board.


    So, someone pressed the 5 button, the door closed, and we started upward again.  After only a few seconds, the lurching started again... continued 3 or 4 times, and then the elevator stopped.  The indicator said 4. 


    Someone tried the "open" button, but that did not work.  They pressed a variety of other buttons, and none of them worked.  I think all of us realized we were stuck, and we seemed to be in total shock.


    After a minute or so, and several more tries with the buttons, some bright soul found the communication controls on the control panel, and made a call.  We were all relieved to hear an answering voice.  A quick exchange of information ensued, and the voice said to hold on, someone would be right over.


    So there we were... about a dozen people, average age about 70, stuck in an elevator.


    There was a little restless conversation and one more communication thru the box over the next 10 minutes or so.  Very soon, it got hot, and I started to sweat.  Some woman kindly handed me a Kleenex.  My 75 yr old legs were rapidly giving out, and I wondered about the others... some of whom were several years older than me.  I leaned my head against the wall, and about three people asked me if I was OK?  I said yes, but in fact, I really wasn't OK. 


    I thought about sitting on the floor, but there really was not enough room to do that.  It got worse when one of the ladies talked about her sister being claustrophobic.  She looked at me and asked, "Are you claustrophobic?" Actually, at that moment, I was, but I said I was OK.


    Finally, I thought to myself, "I've got to do something.  This is driving me crazy.  What can I do?"


    And then, I had a great idea... something that would distract me and perhaps the other people too.  So, in my strong authoritative male voice, I brashly said:


    Would it be OK with you folks if I sang a song?


    Well, I do have a commanding voice, and I certainly got their attention.  I said again, "I'd like to sing a song... would that be OK with you?"

    People were staring me as if I were crazy (which I am), and 3 or 4 said "yes", and one woman said "As long as it's a happy song!"


    I replied:  "I have just the song for you."

    So, they were quiet... I cleared my throat, and began, in a very good voice:

    I see trees of green... red roses too...


    Well, you've never seen so many smiles in all your life.  It seemed everyone on the elevator recognized the song (that is, "What a Wonderful World"... Louis Armstrong... but I don't sing like him).


    By the middle of the second line, almost everyone on the elevator was singing along with me... all of them with big smiles on their face! I sang all of the verses, and while many people didn't remember the precise lyrics, the group sing continued until the end. Clearly, everybody was enjoying themselves.


    If you don't know this song, it has very tender and warm music and tones, and wonderfully optimistic lyrics.  It's one of my favorite songs, and I have probably sung this song more than any other.

    At the end, there was uproar of applause and cheering, and I felt really good.  I had forgotten about my tired old legs. I think everyone realized they had just shared quite an unusual experience in this crowded elevator.


    The woman next to me said, "Are you a professional singer?", and I felt good all over again.  I said no, it was just a hobby with me.  After this, everyone on the elevator was in a much more upbeat mood, and the conversation over the next 5 minutes or so was quite lively.  Since I do like to sing, I started another song, "Try to remember, the kind of September..." and once again, they joined me. But then, I bungled it, and forgot the second line lyrics of the second verse, and started doing "... la  la... la la... etc.".  We all laughed.


    About this time, we heard some knocking on the door, and it seemed our rescuers had arrived.  There was an exchange of words with those outside, so the songs were soon forgotten. After about 5 minutes or so, the doors opened, and we were looking at about 10 firemen, and the opening was between floors, with the 4th level at about my chest in height.  We all cheered the firemen.


    The firemen really looked good.  Many of them were young, and they were all quite buff... they must have a good gym at the firehouse.  They also had big smiles on their faces.  So, two of the firemen dropped down into the elevator, and they handed down a tool box, which we used as a small step stool.  We took turns, with each person stepping up on the tool box, and the two strong firemen in the elevator doing the lifting, and many hands above to catch and lift up.  Well, the firemen did indeed "get personal", if you know what I mean, but I don't think anyone minded much.


    I was the last one out.  I turned my back to the door and stepped backward on to the tool box.  I had strong hands helping me, but I basically lifted myself up so that my butt was sitting on the outside level above, and my legs dangling in the elevator.  From there, I had about a dozen hands lifting me to my feet. I looked around, and saw the firemen, a sheriff's deputy, and a Univ of Md security person.  They were all in a jovial mood.


    So, I led a cheer for the firemen, and then Laurie and I went up the stairs to the 5th level and started walking up the driveway to our car.  About 3 cars went by, with people leaning out the windows, saying, "Great Song! ... Great singing!"  So, I felt good all over again all over again. 


    Getting stuck on an elevator is certainly an obstacle, but, all in all, I think it turned out to be a fun event.  The obstacle became an opportunity.


    Laurie insisted that she needed to drive home, and I decided not to argue with her.  After all, I had made my contribution for the day.  In fact, for one shining moment in time, I was...


    The Elevator Singer!



    [1] This is a true story that happened, Sunday, April 13, 2014



    On Wed, May 7, 2014 at 4:54 PM, Charles Hofer <chofer@kennesaw.edu> wrote:
    All,

    The E-Division's List-serve will not allow me to send you the various
    attachments I have mentioned below. Send me an E-mail directly to
    get them. I have listed the C-2-R Detailed evaluation below after my
    signature so you will have some idea of what each involves.

    There are a number of different ways to make such assessments. The
    University of Texas's engineering school developed an Idea-2-Product
    Competition in the 1990's to make sure that their engineering students
    created realistic projects. It then created an external Idea-2-Product
    Competition in 2003 that invited teams from other U.S. colleges and
    universities. Still later, it invited various international schools
    to I-2-P. Finally, I-2-P itself went international with the first two
    international competitions held in Stockholm, Sweden, in 2011 and 2012.
    Finally, last year's 2013 competition was held in Sao Paulo, Brazil.
    I have attached the judging form that is used in these competitions.

    Also attached is a set of Elevator Pitch guidelines proposed by Rice
    University that is associated with its international business plan
    competition.

    At Kennesaw. we have also created a "Concept-2-Reality" competition
    to encourage students, faculty, alumnae, community members and others
    to turn their concepts into real businesses. I have attached the two
    Evaluation Forms that we use for this competition.  The first form
    lists the factors that we evaluate for all proposed concepts, and the
    second form then summarizes these evaluations for all of the concepts
    that have entered the C-2-R competition.  In the early rounds, when
    there are over 20 concepts, we just double or triple the table to
    cover 40 to 60 concepts.  Typically, we have about 20 entries by the
    finals when we use the version attached.  I have also attached a set
    of descriptions of the 85 Finalists that we have had in the first 14
    competitions that we have held.

    Finally, I would note that the University of Texas has a website that
    describes its Idea-2-Product Competition, and lists the Finalists for
    all of the competitions since its founding in 2003.  It also lists most
    of the participants for these competitions, but I am not sure it has
    covered them all.

    Sincerely,
    Dr. Chuck Hofer
    Regents Professor
    Kennesaw State University
    678-797-2502 KSU Office
    770-757-3575 Cell

    CONCEPT-2-REALITY  EVALUATION  FORM
    Copyright  8 1997 by Charles W. Hofer
    Venture  ____________________________

    Reviewer_____________________________

    I. STARTUP FEASIBILITY RATING  [Maximum Score 100]

    I. PRODUCT/SERVICE FEASIBILITY              Score (Pick One)
    1.Product/Service Idea Conceived                   10
    2.Product/Service Design Finalized                 20
    3.Product/Service Prototype Completed              30
    4.Product/Service Final Product Available          40
    5.Product/Service In Use & Reliability Checked     50

    II. MARKET/CUSTOMER FEASIBILITY              Score (Pick One)
    1.Market/Customer Demand Assumed                   10
    2.Survey of Customers Market Completed             20
    3.Some Customers Have Made Purchases               30
    4.Substantial #s of Customers Have Made Purchases  40
    5.Substantial # of Customers Have Made Repurchases 50

    LONG TERM PROFIT POTENTIAL RATING [Maximum Score 100]

    I. SIZE OF (POTENTIAL) CUSTOMER BASE          Score (Pick one)
    1.Limited Appeal Market (Niche Market)              5
    2.Moderate Appeal Market (Small Segment)           10
    3.Intermediate Appeal Market (Medium Segment)      15
    4.Mass Appeal Market (Large & Very Large Segments) 20

    II. ANNUAL SALES REVENUES PER CUSTOMER        Score (Pick one)
    1.$1 to $100/year                                   5
    2.$100 to $1000/year                               10
    3.$1000 to $10,000/year                            15
    4.> $10,000/year                                   20

    III.NUMBER & STRENGTH OF COMPETITORS          Score (Pick one)
    1.Mostly Weak Competitors                          20
    2.Several Competent Competitors                    15
    3.Many Competent Competitors
        or a Few Strong Competitors                    10
    4.Several Strong Competitors                        5

    IV.YOUR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGES                 Score (Pick one)
    1.Several Minor Advantages, or
         a Few Moderate Advantages                      5
    2.Many Moderate Advantages, or
         a Few Strong Advantages                       10
      Many Strong Advantages                           20

    V.SUSTAINABILITY OF ADVANTAGES                 Score (Pick one)
    1.Advantages Primarily Short-Term in Duration       5
    2.Advantages of Intermediate Duration              10
    3.Advantages of Long Duration                      20

    TOTAL RATING SCORE [Maximum Score 200]           _____


    ----- Original Message -----
    From: "Raymond Jones" <rjjones@D.UMN.EDU>
    To: ENTREP@AOMLISTS.PACE.EDU
    Sent: Tuesday, May 6, 2014 2:25:51 PM
    Subject: [ENTREP] Judging Rubric for Elevator Pitches

    I was wondering if any one has a grading/judging rubric they like and would
    be willing to share for student elevator pitches? One tailored to social
    enterprises would be great is anyone has one, but that is not a necessity.

    Feel free to email me directly.

    Thank you very much for your assistance.

    Raymond



    --
    Raymond J. Jones, III, Ph.D.
    Assistant Professor of Entrepreneurship
    Management Studies Department
    Labovitz School of Business and Economics
    University of Minnesota Duluth
    1318 Kirby Drive, LSBE 365B
    Duluth, MN 55812
    Office: 218-726-6093

    **************************************
    This message is from ENTREP which is sponsored by the Entrepreneurship Division of the Academy of Management.

    Please do not post messages with attached files. Commercial messages or spammed messages are not allowed on the list.  The use of auto-responder "out-of-office" messages may also lead to your removal from the list.

    You can manage your subscription options, including joining or leaving the list here:
    http://aomlists.pace.edu/scripts/wa.exe?SUBED1=entrep&A=1

    If you have questions or need help, please contact Dr. John Bunch  jbunch@benedictine.edu.

    Ventures HO!

    **************************************
    This message is from ENTREP which is sponsored by the Entrepreneurship Division of the Academy of Management.

    Please do not post messages with attached files. Commercial messages or spammed messages are not allowed on the list.  The use of auto-responder "out-of-office" messages may also lead to your removal from the list.

    You can manage your subscription options, including joining or leaving the list here:
    http://aomlists.pace.edu/scripts/wa.exe?SUBED1=entrep&A=1

    If you have questions or need help, please contact Dr. John Bunch  jbunch@benedictine.edu.

    Ventures HO!



    --

    Henry P Sims, Jr
    Professor Emeritus of Organizational Behavior
    Department of Management and Organization
    Robert H. Smith School of Business
    University of Maryland

    410-360-4767
    410-530-5677 (cell)
    hsims@rhsmith.umd.edu
     
    1196 Watervale Ct
    Pasadena, Md 21122

     
    ************************************** This message is from ENTREP which is sponsored by the Entrepreneurship Division of the Academy of Management. Please do not post messages with attached files. Commercial messages or spammed messages are not allowed on the list. The use of auto-responder "out-of-office" messages may also lead to your removal from the list. You can manage your subscription options, including joining or leaving the list here: http://aomlists.pace.edu/scripts/wa.exe?SUBED1=entrep&A=1 If you have questions or need help, please contact Dr. John Bunch jbunch@benedictine.edu. Ventures HO!


  • 8.  Judging Rubric for Elevator Pitches

    Posted 05-08-2014 19:56
    Rock on, Henry! I will think of you every time I hear that one... 


    Norris

     "How can I help you to grow entrepreneurs?" 
    Norris Krueger, Ph.D.
    Entrepreneurship Northwest
         208.440.3747



    On Thu, May 8, 2014 at 9:49 AM, Hank Sims <hsims@rhsmith.umd.edu> wrote:
    here is a true story about an elevator pitch... it has nothing to do with the original question... about 5 minutes to read.  It's entitled:

    The Elevator Singer[1]


    Laurie and I went up to Baltimore today to see a touring Broadway play, “Ghost”… a musical adaptation of the well-known movie starring Patrick Swayze and Demi Moore.  The movie… and the play… are most notable because of the lead song, “Unchained Melody”  (Oh… my love… my darling… etc.)  Really a great song.


    After the play, we followed the crowd out to the parking garage, where we had parked before the performance.  We had to wait quite a bit… maybe 15 minutes… for the elevator, since we had parked on the 5th level, and the climb was a bit too much for my 75 yr old legs.  Finally, the elevator arrived almost in front of us, and we entered, along with about 15 other people.  We did put quite a few people on the elevator.


    The door closed, and people called out their various floors.  We got up to the third floor, and the elevator slowed… and then started to lurch and bump.  Lurch, bump, lurch… about 4 times.  Finally it stopped.  According to the indicator, we were at the 3rd level.  Someone said “I want to get out!” in a very insistent tone of voice, so someone pressed the door “open” button, and the door opened on the 3rd level.  About 3 people rushed out, looking very fearful.  Somebody said, “Anybody else?”, and since I still did not want to climb 2 floors, Laurie and I elected to stay on board.


    So, someone pressed the 5 button, the door closed, and we started upward again.  After only a few seconds, the lurching started again… continued 3 or 4 times, and then the elevator stopped.  The indicator said 4. 


    Someone tried the “open” button, but that did not work.  They pressed a variety of other buttons, and none of them worked.  I think all of us realized we were stuck, and we seemed to be in total shock.


    After a minute or so, and several more tries with the buttons, some bright soul found the communication controls on the control panel, and made a call.  We were all relieved to hear an answering voice.  A quick exchange of information ensued, and the voice said to hold on, someone would be right over.


    So there we were… about a dozen people, average age about 70, stuck in an elevator.


    There was a little restless conversation and one more communication thru the box over the next 10 minutes or so.  Very soon, it got hot, and I started to sweat.  Some woman kindly handed me a Kleenex.  My 75 yr old legs were rapidly giving out, and I wondered about the others… some of whom were several years older than me.  I leaned my head against the wall, and about three people asked me if I was OK?  I said yes, but in fact, I really wasn’t OK. 


    I thought about sitting on the floor, but there really was not enough room to do that.  It got worse when one of the ladies talked about her sister being claustrophobic.  She looked at me and asked, “Are you claustrophobic?” Actually, at that moment, I was, but I said I was OK.


    Finally, I thought to myself, “I’ve got to do something.  This is driving me crazy.  What can I do?”


    And then, I had a great idea… something that would distract me and perhaps the other people too.  So, in my strong authoritative male voice, I brashly said:


    Would it be OK with you folks if I sang a song?


    Well, I do have a commanding voice, and I certainly got their attention.  I said again, “I’d like to sing a song… would that be OK with you?”

    People were staring me as if I were crazy (which I am), and 3 or 4 said “yes”, and one woman said “As long as it’s a happy song!”


    I replied:  “I have just the song for you.”

    So, they were quiet… I cleared my throat, and began, in a very good voice:

    I see trees of green… red roses too…


    Well, you’ve never seen so many smiles in all your life.  It seemed everyone on the elevator recognized the song (that is, “What a Wonderful World”… Louis Armstrong… but I don’t sing like him).


    By the middle of the second line, almost everyone on the elevator was singing along with me… all of them with big smiles on their face! I sang all of the verses, and while many people didn’t remember the precise lyrics, the group sing continued until the end. Clearly, everybody was enjoying themselves.


    If you don’t know this song, it has very tender and warm music and tones, and wonderfully optimistic lyrics.  It’s one of my favorite songs, and I have probably sung this song more than any other.

    At the end, there was uproar of applause and cheering, and I felt really good.  I had forgotten about my tired old legs. I think everyone realized they had just shared quite an unusual experience in this crowded elevator.


    The woman next to me said, “Are you a professional singer?”, and I felt good all over again.  I said no, it was just a hobby with me.  After this, everyone on the elevator was in a much more upbeat mood, and the conversation over the next 5 minutes or so was quite lively.  Since I do like to sing, I started another song, “Try to remember, the kind of September…” and once again, they joined me. But then, I bungled it, and forgot the second line lyrics of the second verse, and started doing “… la  la… la la… etc.”.  We all laughed.


    About this time, we heard some knocking on the door, and it seemed our rescuers had arrived.  There was an exchange of words with those outside, so the songs were soon forgotten. After about 5 minutes or so, the doors opened, and we were looking at about 10 firemen, and the opening was between floors, with the 4th level at about my chest in height.  We all cheered the firemen.


    The firemen really looked good.  Many of them were young, and they were all quite buff… they must have a good gym at the firehouse.  They also had big smiles on their faces.  So, two of the firemen dropped down into the elevator, and they handed down a tool box, which we used as a small step stool.  We took turns, with each person stepping up on the tool box, and the two strong firemen in the elevator doing the lifting, and many hands above to catch and lift up.  Well, the firemen did indeed “get personal”, if you know what I mean, but I don’t think anyone minded much.


    I was the last one out.  I turned my back to the door and stepped backward on to the tool box.  I had strong hands helping me, but I basically lifted myself up so that my butt was sitting on the outside level above, and my legs dangling in the elevator.  From there, I had about a dozen hands lifting me to my feet. I looked around, and saw the firemen, a sheriff’s deputy, and a Univ of Md security person.  They were all in a jovial mood.


    So, I led a cheer for the firemen, and then Laurie and I went up the stairs to the 5th level and started walking up the driveway to our car.  About 3 cars went by, with people leaning out the windows, saying, “Great Song! … Great singing!”  So, I felt good all over again all over again. 


    Getting stuck on an elevator is certainly an obstacle, but, all in all, I think it turned out to be a fun event.  The obstacle became an opportunity.


    Laurie insisted that she needed to drive home, and I decided not to argue with her.  After all, I had made my contribution for the day.  In fact, for one shining moment in time, I was


    The Elevator Singer!



    [1] This is a true story that happened, Sunday, April 13, 2014



    On Wed, May 7, 2014 at 4:54 PM, Charles Hofer <chofer@kennesaw.edu> wrote:
    All,

    The E-Division's List-serve will not allow me to send you the various
    attachments I have mentioned below. Send me an E-mail directly to
    get them. I have listed the C-2-R Detailed evaluation below after my
    signature so you will have some idea of what each involves.

    There are a number of different ways to make such assessments. The
    University of Texas's engineering school developed an Idea-2-Product
    Competition in the 1990's to make sure that their engineering students
    created realistic projects. It then created an external Idea-2-Product
    Competition in 2003 that invited teams from other U.S. colleges and
    universities. Still later, it invited various international schools
    to I-2-P. Finally, I-2-P itself went international with the first two
    international competitions held in Stockholm, Sweden, in 2011 and 2012.
    Finally, last year's 2013 competition was held in Sao Paulo, Brazil.
    I have attached the judging form that is used in these competitions.

    Also attached is a set of Elevator Pitch guidelines proposed by Rice
    University that is associated with its international business plan
    competition.

    At Kennesaw. we have also created a "Concept-2-Reality" competition
    to encourage students, faculty, alumnae, community members and others
    to turn their concepts into real businesses. I have attached the two
    Evaluation Forms that we use for this competition.  The first form
    lists the factors that we evaluate for all proposed concepts, and the
    second form then summarizes these evaluations for all of the concepts
    that have entered the C-2-R competition.  In the early rounds, when
    there are over 20 concepts, we just double or triple the table to
    cover 40 to 60 concepts.  Typically, we have about 20 entries by the
    finals when we use the version attached.  I have also attached a set
    of descriptions of the 85 Finalists that we have had in the first 14
    competitions that we have held.

    Finally, I would note that the University of Texas has a website that
    describes its Idea-2-Product Competition, and lists the Finalists for
    all of the competitions since its founding in 2003.  It also lists most
    of the participants for these competitions, but I am not sure it has
    covered them all.

    Sincerely,
    Dr. Chuck Hofer
    Regents Professor
    Kennesaw State University
    678-797-2502 KSU Office
    770-757-3575 Cell

    CONCEPT-2-REALITY  EVALUATION  FORM
    Copyright  8 1997 by Charles W. Hofer
    Venture  ____________________________

    Reviewer_____________________________

    I. STARTUP FEASIBILITY RATING  [Maximum Score 100]

    I. PRODUCT/SERVICE FEASIBILITY              Score (Pick One)
    1.Product/Service Idea Conceived                   10
    2.Product/Service Design Finalized                 20
    3.Product/Service Prototype Completed              30
    4.Product/Service Final Product Available          40
    5.Product/Service In Use & Reliability Checked     50

    II. MARKET/CUSTOMER FEASIBILITY              Score (Pick One)
    1.Market/Customer Demand Assumed                   10
    2.Survey of Customers Market Completed             20
    3.Some Customers Have Made Purchases               30
    4.Substantial #s of Customers Have Made Purchases  40
    5.Substantial # of Customers Have Made Repurchases 50

    LONG TERM PROFIT POTENTIAL RATING [Maximum Score 100]

    I. SIZE OF (POTENTIAL) CUSTOMER BASE          Score (Pick one)
    1.Limited Appeal Market (Niche Market)              5
    2.Moderate Appeal Market (Small Segment)           10
    3.Intermediate Appeal Market (Medium Segment)      15
    4.Mass Appeal Market (Large & Very Large Segments) 20

    II. ANNUAL SALES REVENUES PER CUSTOMER        Score (Pick one)
    1.$1 to $100/year                                   5
    2.$100 to $1000/year                               10
    3.$1000 to $10,000/year                            15
    4.> $10,000/year                                   20

    III.NUMBER & STRENGTH OF COMPETITORS          Score (Pick one)
    1.Mostly Weak Competitors                          20
    2.Several Competent Competitors                    15
    3.Many Competent Competitors
        or a Few Strong Competitors                    10
    4.Several Strong Competitors                        5

    IV.YOUR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGES                 Score (Pick one)
    1.Several Minor Advantages, or
         a Few Moderate Advantages                      5
    2.Many Moderate Advantages, or
         a Few Strong Advantages                       10
      Many Strong Advantages                           20

    V.SUSTAINABILITY OF ADVANTAGES                 Score (Pick one)
    1.Advantages Primarily Short-Term in Duration       5
    2.Advantages of Intermediate Duration              10
    3.Advantages of Long Duration                      20

    TOTAL RATING SCORE [Maximum Score 200]           _____


    ----- Original Message -----
    From: "Raymond Jones" <rjjones@D.UMN.EDU>
    To: ENTREP@AOMLISTS.PACE.EDU
    Sent: Tuesday, May 6, 2014 2:25:51 PM
    Subject: [ENTREP] Judging Rubric for Elevator Pitches

    I was wondering if any one has a grading/judging rubric they like and would
    be willing to share for student elevator pitches? One tailored to social
    enterprises would be great is anyone has one, but that is not a necessity.

    Feel free to email me directly.

    Thank you very much for your assistance.

    Raymond



    --
    Raymond J. Jones, III, Ph.D.
    Assistant Professor of Entrepreneurship
    Management Studies Department
    Labovitz School of Business and Economics
    University of Minnesota Duluth
    1318 Kirby Drive, LSBE 365B
    Duluth, MN 55812
    Office: 218-726-6093

    **************************************
    This message is from ENTREP which is sponsored by the Entrepreneurship Division of the Academy of Management.

    Please do not post messages with attached files. Commercial messages or spammed messages are not allowed on the list.  The use of auto-responder "out-of-office" messages may also lead to your removal from the list.

    You can manage your subscription options, including joining or leaving the list here:
    http://aomlists.pace.edu/scripts/wa.exe?SUBED1=entrep&A=1

    If you have questions or need help, please contact Dr. John Bunch  jbunch@benedictine.edu.

    Ventures HO!

    **************************************
    This message is from ENTREP which is sponsored by the Entrepreneurship Division of the Academy of Management.

    Please do not post messages with attached files. Commercial messages or spammed messages are not allowed on the list.  The use of auto-responder "out-of-office" messages may also lead to your removal from the list.

    You can manage your subscription options, including joining or leaving the list here:
    http://aomlists.pace.edu/scripts/wa.exe?SUBED1=entrep&A=1

    If you have questions or need help, please contact Dr. John Bunch  jbunch@benedictine.edu.

    Ventures HO!



    --

    Henry P Sims, Jr
    Professor Emeritus of Organizational Behavior
    Department of Management and Organization
    Robert H. Smith School of Business
    University of Maryland

    410-360-4767
     
    1196 Watervale Ct
    Pasadena, Md 21122

     
    ************************************** This message is from ENTREP which is sponsored by the Entrepreneurship Division of the Academy of Management. Please do not post messages with attached files. Commercial messages or spammed messages are not allowed on the list. The use of auto-responder "out-of-office" messages may also lead to your removal from the list. You can manage your subscription options, including joining or leaving the list here: http://aomlists.pace.edu/scripts/wa.exe?SUBED1=entrep&A=1 If you have questions or need help, please contact Dr. John Bunch jbunch@benedictine.edu. Ventures HO!

    ************************************** This message is from ENTREP which is sponsored by the Entrepreneurship Division of the Academy of Management. Please do not post messages with attached files. Commercial messages or spammed messages are not allowed on the list. The use of auto-responder "out-of-office" messages may also lead to your removal from the list. You can manage your subscription options, including joining or leaving the list here: http://aomlists.pace.edu/scripts/wa.exe?SUBED1=entrep&A=1 If you have questions or need help, please contact Dr. John Bunch jbunch@benedictine.edu. Ventures HO!